Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

Hey folks! Sadly it's not quite as clear cut as I believed at first.. Nothing can be simple or clear xD People seem split on this section. However I take it as their "safety clause" for content that appears to be non-prohibited, but due to surrounding circumstances, might be deemed prohibited. Even if it is cartoony.. They make a strong point to mention tags, titles, text, and accompanying data. Which leads me to be believe its for material that uses live actors/actual victims in its creation even if the end results are cartoony. Such examples might be people using a real minor as a reference for drawn lewd art. Let's say an artist draws a lewd loli and admits to using his younger sister as the reference. Or even a lewd animation that uses minors for voice overs. Although I suppose there is some possibility the fictional age may matter. So it might be best to avoid letting that information out unless said character is 18+, like Patoots! I find it unlikely that they would create a nicely explained section detailing whats okay so long as its not real-life actors then pull a total "psyche!" in a few sections down. If they were gonna ban lolisho they'd have said it up front and not relied on some round-about method in the footnotes. *Note, when they say "Expression" they mean actual content. So "Content of the expression" is essentially "Content of the content". My plans are to continue on as normal.

Files

Comments

Seedy Fuk

lol seems they tried to word it "correctly" and in turn got textually tongue-tied, good to here your being a trooper and keeping the loli dream alive. looking forward to your next installments

italic01

But why put Incest in that list though? The brother and sister could be 30 years old having sex with eachother. Do they believe that always includes minors when it comes to Incest?

munkeyma

Yeah wasn't Patoots birthday like June/July '96 or so? Just going off memory from your nuked sites intro page =p